Wednesday, June 17, 2026

Kenya: common ground, common word, common mission

We become human by participating in a beloved community,

a common experience and common effort on a common ground

to which one willingly belongs.

                                                                                    Wendall Berry

 

I’ll begin this writing from a tidy hermitage on the sumptuous campus of Subiaco Retreat Center in Karen, just outside of Nairobi, Kenya, which is run by the Benedictine Missionary Sisters of Tutzing. I am here to take part in a series of events with our Shi’a partners from Qom, Iran led by Professor Mohammad Shomali, with whom DIMMID has had a relationship for many years now. I arrived for the tail end of one event, was able to participate in a second one, and will attend the first day of the third. I only had a brief window in my calendar when I was asked to come, but I am very glad to have this experience.

 

I heard Dr. Shomali give the most substantive version of his history of dialogue with Christianity the other day. When he was doing his doctorate at the University of Manchester in the UK in the 1990s, he had the desire to learn more about Christianity. He first got himself involved with the Focolare Movement, with whom he still has strong ties, and visited Mariapolis in the UK several times. Along the way he met a monk-priest from Ampleforth Abbey, Fr. Jonathan. When he expressed his desire to visit a Catholic seminary, this Fr. Jonathan invited him instead to visit the abbey where he consequently met the abbot, the late Timothy Wright. Mohammad spent two days there and says that he simply loved the atmosphere of the place. In 2001 Abbot Timothy invited him to come back and give a talk on Islam to the monks. The abbot himself pointed out, in a filmed interview, how notable this was for their community in Yorkshire which had very little reference to anything outside of Yorkshire let alone the Islamic world. But the talk went very well and was very much appreciated. The following year Professor Shomali invited Fr. Jonathan to come to his home in Qom, Iran, the largest center for Shi’a scholarship in the world where Mohammad was and still is a distinguished teacher, but the abbot insisted on coming along too. Thus was born a friendship that has lasting repercussions.

 

What followed on that was the first of a series of Catholic-Shi’a dialogues that took place between Ampleforth Abbey and the now defunct Jesuit Heythrop College in 2003, then again in 2005 and 2007. In between there was another visit to Iran. After a little break in time, then-Abbot Primate Notker Wolf got wind of all this and asked that there be something specifically for Benedictines and at that point Abbot Timothy introduced Professor Shomali to Fr. William Skudlarek who was then Secretary General of DIMMID, and another series of meetings began, first at Sant’Anselmo, followed by encounters in Qom, Assisi, Mashhad (Iran), Kenya, South Africa, and Senegal.

 

Along the way Professor Shomali also started a program called Wings of Unity in conjunction with the Focolari and Sophia University in Loppano, Italy, and his relationship with the movement continues. His International Institute of Islamic Studies has also developed a close collaboration here in Nairobi with Tangaza University. For the past nine years it has been a regular part of his Iranian seminarians’ training, both women and men, to spend several weeks here in dialogue with their Christian counterparts, always under the theme “Unity of God, Unity in God.” In addition, there is a Christian-Shi’a summer school program here as well which is going on its seventh year.

 

Of course, what makes this all the more poignant, especially for me as an American, is that the majority of the participants are Iranians. I myself had a hard time getting here because of cancelled and delayed flights, mainly due to the rerouting because of the war, I was told during my long layover in Doha, Qatar. For them it was worse. Mohammad told me that there was a brief window when the airport was open between bombings but that they were prepared to cross the border into Turkey by car and fly from there if they had to. Luckily the window opened again just in time for them to fly out. I had expected there to be drawn faces and stories of terror, but I was surprised at how light-hearted they were about it all, even making jokes. They told me this kind of dark humor is “the Iranian way.” There were many comments like, “Well, we will see what President Trump has to say tomorrow…” At one point I was trying to slip between two chairs in the eating hall and someone commented, “It’s like the Strait of Hormuz!” ––and everyone laughed. Mohammad has been very careful not to talk about politics and only gave the briefest mention of it once when somebody asked him a general question about war. His summation was, “Well, we didn’t start this war. America attacked us. Of course we are going to defend ourselves.”

 

I have been gently trying to learn more about their relationship to the Supreme Leader, both Ayatollah Ali Khamenei who was killed in a US-Israeli air strike in February, and his son and successor Mojtaba Khamenei. About that there was no joking; they saw the Ayatollah’s “murder” as nothing less than a great tragedy, outside of any comment about their policies or those of the government. What I heard in Senegal I heard again here with even greater emphasis after these months of active war; they say that the West does not see how many people take to the streets in support of the government, and that support has increased due to national pride in the face of threats of being “blown back into the Stone Age,” the opposite of what the American administration was counting on.

 

I, along with another gentleman from Canada and his son, have been staying with the women at this Benedictine spiritual center and convent, Subiaco, in a luscious part of Nairobi called Karen. (The other men have been housed across town.) This area is verdant and well-cared for, full of large gated compounds. No trees are allowed to be cut here, and because of the thick growth it also stays cooler in the hot months. I am told that the area is actually named Karen after a British woman of the same name who claimed it for the British during colonial times, as a matter of fact the famous Karen Blixen of “Out of Africa” fame. Now it is inhabited by other wealthy folks, government officials and foreign businesspeople.

 

I was supposed to be a part of the end of their period at Tangaza but I didn’t arrive until Thursday morning instead of Tuesday evening. I had prepared about six pages of notes on the theme of justice in Islam and Christianity, as had been requested of me, and I was sorry not to get to use the whole thing. My second event was to speak at a one-day conference at St Paul’s University the day I finally arrived, and so after a shower, a shave and a brief nap, myself and another recently arrived guest were ushered across town to that. Whereas Tangaza is a consortium of Catholic religious congregations, St. Paul’s is run by the Anglican Church of Kenya and hosts students from various Protestant denominations. The theme there was also “Justice and Dignity from Islamic and Christian Perspectives” but Professor Shomali wanted me to speak about Monastic Interreligious Dialogue, and specifically our relationship with Islam. I had missed my speaking spot, but they squeezed me in after lunch, limiting my time to 15 minutes. As I got up to speak I suddenly had the inspiration to sing, a cappella, the refrain of “The Ground We Share”––“The holy ground is the ground that we share \ like the holy city Jerusalem, \ the prophets’ land and my parents’ land, \ the land of peace and the ground that we share”––and based my remarks on that. I explained that the Catholic Church’s approach to interreligious dialogue always starts with our common humanity. I love the way Nostra Aetate begins by recognizing that “One is the community of all peoples, one their origin, for God made the whole human race to live over the face of the earth. One also is their final goal, God.” For us that means that every person possesses an inherent dignity and therefore deserves fair treatment regardless of race or social standing. The Holy Father has been re-echoing this repeatedly, even in his powerful remarks addressed to migrants the other day in Spain. Then I slip in that the guiding documents out of the Dicastery speak about the four different kinds of dialogue. The first two, before we do any kind of active evangelization or theological exchange, are the dialogue of life and the dialogue of action, a call to cooperate with people of other faiths in projects of mutual interest. This, again, is because we always begin with that common humanity. Pope St. John Paul II in Fides et Ratio said, concerning discernment in interreligious dialogue, that the first criteria must always be “the universality of the human spirit, whose basic needs are the same in the most disparate cultures.” That is “the ground we share”: the universality of the human spirit.

 

The men and women participants were altogether on the long bus ride home from St. Paul’s back to Subiaco. The men were a great bunch, more like a football team on holiday than staid seminarians. They were very affable and immediately wanted to get to know me. I had a marvelous conversation with the gentleman I sat next to about the spiritual life, him asking me lots of penetrating questions about monasticism and the priesthood, comparing it to the householder life of a husband and father. It reminded me of my friend Hassan, another Iranian who I met in 2024 at a conference in Kerala during another long bus ride.

 

The next day we were all guests at a day-long conference at Tangaza sponsored by the African Academy of Religions. As a Westerner I have grown to be very careful about generically referring to people as being from “Africa” as opposed to their own country in Africa and also slow to call something an “African proverb.” So it was interesting to be at a conference that was dealing with “The Ambivalence of Faith in Africa: Power, Knowledge and Gender Dynamics” and to get a glimpse of progressive post-colonialist African theology. I heard some of the same issues that were and are at play in India, the tension between inculturation and syncretism for instance, as well as the delicate work of sifting through what is authentic Christian Catholicism and what a Western European import. There were very scholarly presentations by various African theologians and scholars as well as two Italians dealing with questions such as “Could faith and spirituality be the panacea to the contemporary societal reality to the realization of personhood?” and a de-colonized approach to religion and academic structures, shifting from Eurocentric scholarship to collaborative learning. I have grown to suspect that the concept of Ubuntu, so often quoted by Western progressives, ––“I am because we are; and since we are I am”–– was far overused and perhaps misused, and so it was interesting to hear it employed several times in reference to the “bottom up” approach and “the collective finger theory,” both of which focus more on communities than on institutions. I particularly loved what was introduced to us simply as “an African proverb”: “Until the lion learns to write, his story is always told by the hunter.”

 

That afternoon we began the women’s meeting, mainly with introductions, and then me giving a report on my work with DIMMID and Professor Shomali giving an opening address. Parallel to the other encounters here in Kenya, it was Fr. William who instigated this now regular meeting of Benedictine and Shi’a Sisters here at Subiaco because, as Sr. Lusina told me, “the women are closer to the children.” This was their fourth encounter, and I was told there were more new faces than old, and less Muslim women from Kenya in attendance this time, for whatever reason. To see the friendship and ease between these women is truly inspiring. The Muslim women are so fascinated by Benedictine monastic life, and the nuns are obviously so fond of their Muslim sisters. The Iranian women, as far as I could tell, were all dressed in the full-length chador that only reveals the face, and about half of the women who come from far-flung lands were dressed in long beautiful hijabs and the traditional robe-like abaya, sometimes with beautiful woven shawls. Listening to them and interacting with them would surely dismantle the stereotype that many Westerners have about women in Islam. They were confident, proud, and articulate, and as they introduced themselves and their backgrounds, I was impressed to find out that many of them were seminary students and several of them already held doctorates––one woman had three doctorates, one was a medical doctor and another was a pediatric neurologist. As a matter of fact, two women publicly praised the deceased Imam Khamenei for bringing greater respect to women and boasted that 60% of Iranian women have degrees of higher learning.

 

The men dropped in briefly for our session on Saturday morning, which of course brought a whole new wave of energy. I was dressed in full white habit by then and to my surprise several of the men were really impressed by that. That led to several lively quick conversations over tea about the meaning of the habit and monastic life in general. There was also one genial chap who put his arm around me and, as Hassan did on the bus trip in Kerala, started singing to me, in Farsi, poems of the great Sufi mystic Hafez who was from this man’s hometown, Shiraz. A very solid pleasant image of Iranians is starting to congeal in my mind. The men were on their way to the Focolare center at Mariapolis to begin a Week of Unity there. The women joined them there on Sunday after their encounter was over and Sr. Lusina and I were to go as well just for the day on Monday.

 

I was very impressed by the credentials of the men as well as I learned more about them. Some of them are studying Swahili and Italian so they can deepen their relationship with their partners in Kenya and Italy. (They most of them already spoke English at least as well as I speak Italian.) One was telling me about his specialty in Islamic psychology, for another instance, really applying faith in every aspect of life. The presenter who gave the introduction to Islam a few days later at Mariapolis strongly affirmed that if there is a doubt between faith and reason, the Shi’a tradition always sides with reason. I was very impressed by that, and my young Cameroonian friend from Focolare who was sitting next to me and I had a quick whispered conversation about John Paul II’s Fides et ratio as well as, of course, Anselm’s fides quaerens intellectum. In spiritual direction or counseling (of which I do little) have always operated out of the conviction that if you feel like you have to choose between good mental health and what you think the Gospel teaches, choose mental health and you will actually find that the Gospel is actually not far behind. This seems to be like very strong faith not the lack of it.

 

I have heard Professor Shomali speak several times now, particularly back in Senegal, but the two talks he gave on Saturday were the best things I have heard him deliver thus far. To our small group of the women plus me he laid out his vision for what he calls the School of God. His underlying approach is relatively straightforward: he does not speak of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam as three different religions, but one religion, which in and of itself could be a controversial position to take in some circles. He stated that God has always revealed only one message, but through many messengers, each one speaking through the language and the culture of their particular community. I assume he did not mean simply Hebrew, Greek or Arabic, but ‘language’ in the broadest sense of the word. He cited Surah 16:36 of the Qur’an (Surah An-Nahl): We surely sent a messenger to every community, saying, “Worship Allah and shun false gods” and Surah 14:4 (Surah Ibrahim): We have not sent a messenger except in the language of his people to clarify the message for them. So Mohammad would like to found this School of God which he says would have as its theme “One School, One Curriculum, Many Teachers,” where students of the various traditions could come and learn from teachers from any of the traditions the common wisdom that we share. In another place he described it as “One authority (God), one wisdom (divine justice), but many teachers.” He did not lay out a practical curriculum but obviously some of this is already taking place as he sends his seminarians to Kenya to learn from their Christian counterparts. And I saw firsthand how eager they sincerely are to learn from us and about us. Then later that same afternoon the talk he gave on human dignity for the sisters of Sacred Heart Priory on human dignity and justice was simply excellent, and I caught a glimpse of why this man is such a respected and popular teacher. I won’t even begin to summarize it here, but I was glad to find out it was filmed and published on YouTube.[1]

 

Besides all of this, there was also the interaction with the Benedictine sisters there at Sacred Heart Priory. Friday was the Solemnity of the Sacred Heart of Jesus, which is their titular feast. Sr. Lusina, in her understated way, warned me that 7 AM Mass “might take a little longer than usual.” The music was joyous from the first moment, with eight sisters dancing up the aisle leading the procession to a song in Swahili accompanied by the choir in three-part harmony, organ and drums and other percussion, punctuated by the most jubilant ululation I have ever heard. All the while the other sisters and the rest of us who were not timid were pretty much dancing in our pews as well, at least making synchronized full body gestures. That carried on into the other acclamations. I had to leave for the conference at Tangaza with the women at 8 AM, by which point we had just reached the offertory procession, which was again accompanied by dancing up the aisle with the gifts. I was sorry to have to leave.

 

That same evening Sr. Lusina invited me to join the sisters in their refectory for dinner and asked if I would please sing a few songs for the community as well––an invitation I am always hoping for, to be perfectly honest, though I am always nervous about how a borrowed guitar will do for me. This one worked out fine. I sang two songs, “Behind and Before Me,” a ballad version of Psalm 139, and then taught them the ostinato for my “Streams of Living Water,” which they not only learned almost immediately after one listen but spontaneously added a perfect alto harmony by the second iteration in typical African choral style. I of course, buoyed up by that strong bed of vocals, was free to improvise pretty freely on the obligato verses over the top. It may be the most memorable performance of that piece ever after probably thousands of times singing it. When we finished singing, Sr Rosa, the prioress, asked me to say a few words about DIMMID and as she came up to thank me the sisters spontaneously broke out singing it again, this time very rhythmically with handclaps, which totally changed the character of the song, and ululating at the end. The music for Sunday Mass, was almost as jubilant and many of the Muslim sisters were in the back row for the entire celebration, commenting afterward how moving an experience it was for them.

 

The Week of Unity is an outgrowth of Shomali’s work with Wings of Unity, an academic initiative that advocates for profound dialogue between Christianity and Islam. In it, “students and academics come together to build bridges in a global effort to ease cultural tensions,” as their own website describes it. “In a world fraught with cultural and religious tensions, initiatives that are capable of building bridges become particularly valuable. Since 2016 Wings of Unity has provided a space for academic gatherings and profound dialogue between different religions.” It also is a fruit of Mohammad’s long relationship with the Focolare Movement and the Sophia University Institute in Loppano, Italy. This Week of Unity took place at Focolare’s Mariapolis Piero about an hour outside of Nairobi. They were to be together for five days, but I had to leave for Rome on Tuesday, and so Sr. Lusina and I decided to stay on at Subiaco and just go on Monday, so to be able to be there at least for the opening day.

 

After a traffic bound drive across Nairobi, we arrived just in time for breakfast. Seeing and being welcomed by all of our sister and brother Muslim friends there in a new context was a particular delight. (Though I did get greeted by a slightly reproving tone of voice from one who said, “You are not wearing your beautiful white robes.”) Along with them of course were many others, perhaps 100 persons in all, from all over Africa; I know for sure Cameroon, Tanzania, and Uganda were all represented. I had told Mohammad that if he wanted me to do anything I would be available just that day. We had the borrowed guitar, and I brought along my notes from the talk that I did not get to give the week before.

 

The program was supposed to start at 9 AM. We had a running joke about whether that was Kenya time or American time because I kept showing up for everything as punctual as the trains in Switzerland only to be left with lots of time on my hands. But this time the wait was really extending. Suddenly someone came up behind me and said, Fr. Joseph, who was to speak first, “wants you to give your talk at 12:00.” What talk?! Okay, not a problem. And then Mohammad came up behind me at about 9:30 and said, “Our first presentation is delayed and everyone is here. Can you do some music to fill in time for a half an hour?” I had told him about a song I had written two years back called “People of the Book” for which I chant the verse of the Qur’an in Arabic on which the song is based, Surah 3:64: “People of the Book, let us come to a common word between you and us, that we will worship none but Allah alone…” So he said, “Sing the one where you chant from the Qur’an.” If I was every going to sing it in front of everyone, it was going to be with fear and trembling––meaning with deep respect and care not to offend anyone’s sensibilities by daring to chant their sacred words, especially in Arabic in front of people who know the Qur’an in Arabic. I begged out at that moment but promised I would sing it later, giving myself some time to relax and practice it again. But I did do two other songs. First of all the full version of “The Ground We Share” again, which incidentally also quotes Surah 17 of the Quran about the Prophet’s night flight, al-Isra’ and ascension, al-mi’raj in Jerusalem (though in English) along with quotes from the psalms of ascents and the Book of Revelation. The explanation of that one is a long teaching in and of itself. And then I sang “Compassionate and Wise,” which combines a Hindu mantra (the mahamytrumjaya, “the great mantra for overcoming death”) with the Buddhist dedication of merit, the explanation of and story behind which again takes a little bit of time. They were both warmly received.

 

Then, as promised, after two other presentations, an introduction to Christianity and an introduction to Islam––imagine trying to do either one of those in 30 minutes!–– I finally got to give my presentation on justice in Islam and Christianity. I spent a little time going over generalities about our common ground and “the common word,” beginning by telling the story of Pope Benedict’s famous misstep in 2006 when in his Regensburg Address he accidentally offended Muslims worldwide. Of course what came out of that was this beautiful document in 2007, “A Common Word,” in which 138 Muslims scholars wrote an open letter to the Holy Father, basically quoting Jesus in the Gospel of Mark 12:30 (repeated in Matthew and Luke) teaching that the greatest commandment is ‘you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, with all your mind, and with all your strength.’ … And the second, like it, is this: ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’ There is no other commandment greater than these. These Muslim scholars then say that this is a common word between you and us, because this is also taught in the Qur’an and in the hadith of the Prophet (PBUH). My whole talk then is based on the premise that we should always start there, as all of our Church’s documents on interreligious dialogue do, on our common humanity, “the universality of the human spirit, whose basic needs are the same in the most disparate cultures,” as Pope John Paul II wrote in Fides et Ratio, before any theological arguments. I also add that even if we never get beyond that, that would be fine too. I also ended by quoting Pope Leo in this marvelous paragraph. After common ground and a common word, we also have a common mission:

 

… Christians and Muslims, drawing from the richness of our respective traditions, are called to a common mission: to revive humanity where it has grown cold, to give voice to those who suffer and to transform indifference into solidarity. Compassion and empathy can be our instruments as they have the power to restore the dignity of the other.[2]

 

And then finally I stepped out and performed “People of the Book.” And I must say, there are few more satisfying feelings than singing someone else’s sacred words for them, and for them to be so appreciative and moved by it. For this of course I thank my background in liturgical music that taught me how to approach a sacred text with dignity and respect. They truly loved it and watching the filmed version of it later, from someone’s iPhone, it was a good performance as well, for which I was grateful. That led to a flurry of short conversations before, during and after lunch. I also was lucky enough to share a little song fest with a young Cameroonian guitarist who was also in attendance, swapping songs in the company of several other newfound brothers from Tanzania and Canada (by way of Iran and Iraq). As we drove away, I told Sr. Lusina that I was just exhausted, but it was the best kind of exhaustion––to be so overwhelmed by the success of an encounter that you are left speechless.

 

All in all, simply a very fruitful stay with marvelous people in Kenya. My driver from the airport when I arrived was named John, and he also brought me back to the airport through the misty darkness early morning Tuesday. He had taught me a few Swahili words on Thursday––asante-“thank you”, habari yako-“how are you?”, rafiki-“friend”, and a word I heard and saw over and over again during my short stay in Kenya, karibu-“welcome.” As we were pulling into Jomo Kenyatta International Airport at 5 AM, I was surprised to see the words karibu tena on the sign for departures. When I asked young John about why you would say “welcome” to someone as they were leaving, he explained that it meant “You are welcome again.” In other words, “Come back!” Which I must admit still brings tears to my eyes when I think of all the beautiful souls I encountered in my brief stay.

 

May it be so.



[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NdML5KvLVuI.

[2] https://www.vatican.va/content/leo-xiv/en/speeches/2026/may/documents/20260511-colloquio-ddi-riifs.html.

Tuesday, June 9, 2026

The Peace Council

 

When I first took on the role of Secretary General for DIM·MID, I had a vague idea of forming an advisory board for my own benefit—one composed of leaders from various religious traditions who could keep me informed about developments in their communities and guide me in approaching sensitive topics with care. I kept this idea in mind during my first months in Rome as I worked through the list of contacts my predecessor Father William Skudlarek had left me—individuals involved in interreligious dialogue who could serve as valuable resources.

One of those meetings was with Professor Gianni La Bella of the Sant’Egidio Community. Our conversation was particularly illuminating and later became the basis of the regular conference I now give around the world to describe the work of Monastic Interreligious Dialogue. At the end of our visit, I asked Professor La Bella what he thought I should do with the organization. Without hesitation, he suggested that we organize an annual international interreligious gathering to pray for and reflect on “peace as a universal patrimony.” I must admit that my heart sank; organizing an annual international gathering was the last thing I wanted to take on. Yet as I walked away from our meeting in Trastevere that morning, it began to feel like both a worthy challenge and a noble endeavor. Soon after, it occurred to me that this gathering could become the very purpose of the advisory board—a steering committee to guide such an initiative.

I began recruiting members, starting with my dear Muslim friend Aaron Maniam, now a professor at Oxford. When we first met, Aaron was working for the government of Singapore and was already deeply engaged in interreligious initiatives. I then invited Rabbi Paula Marcus of California, who is deeply involved in social justice work and in issues concerning the Holy Land, and my brother and fellow guitarist, Rev. Heng Sure, a Buddhist monk and longtime friend of DIM·MID. Next came Arzoo Ahmed, a perceptive young Muslim professional from England who works for one of Europe’s largest medical research agencies, and Lucas Tse, a Chinese scholar and historian currently at Oxford, whom I first met in California and who was working on his own translation of the Tao Te Ching—an area I have long hoped to bring more fully into our work.

I also invited Siddhartha Krishna, a remarkable Hindu pandit from northern India who I met in Rishikesh through a mutual friend. He speaks several languages, including fluent Sanskrit, having been was raised by a father who was a noted Gandhian scholar and a Swiss mother who is a respected yoga teacher in the lineage of B.K.S. Iyengar. I met Weh’na Ka’mu Kwasset Sherri Mitchell during a webinar on which we were both panelists. She is a member of the Penobscot Nation in the northeastern United States and works as a lawyer advocating for Indigenous land rights globally, including with the United Nations. (I have written elsewhere about the need for humanity to recover three essential dimensions—the body, the earth, and the feminine—and how traditional religions hold particular wisdom in these areas.)

To complement this group, I recruited several Christian theologians: Debora Tonelli, who works at Georgetown’s Rome campus and specializes in violence in scripture; Rev. Adam Bucko, an Episcopal priest and author from New York known for his leadership in the new monasticism; and Piotr Zygulski, a young Italian-Polish theologian whose doctoral work at Sophia University (Firenze) focused on Muslim-Christian dialogue had greatly impressed me. Finally, I included my trusted advisor Mark Hansen, an American who has lived for many years in Singapore. Mark brings deep expertise in international affairs and serves on advisory boards for both the American Camaldolese and the World Community for Christian Meditation.

Since a central theme had been suggested by Professor La Bella, we adopted the name “The Peace Council.” (This was before the formation of Mr. Trump’s “Board of Peace,” which unfortunately translates into Italian in the same way as our group, Consiglio di Pace.) We met monthly online for the following year. At each session, I would introduce a topic or text and then open the floor for discussion. More than once, I remarked that a transcript of those conversations would make a fascinating book. The depth of insight and the breadth of common ground we discovered were both striking and deeply gratifying.

As we began discussing how to organize the larger gathering that had originally inspired the group, I found myself growing uneasy. I shared this concern, explaining that I did not think we were ready to launch something so ambitious yet without first meeting in person. I suggested that we gather as a small group before moving forward. To my relief, the response was overwhelmingly positive, and we arranged to meet during the last weekend of May here in Rome, at the Monastery of San Gregorio where I live.

I took a firm hand in organizing this first gathering, explaining that I wanted it to function as a retreat, with myself serving as retreat master. We held six sessions of lectio divina together. I used a method of group lectio that I learned years ago and have since adapted and shared worldwide, though this was my first time applying it in an interreligious context. I asked participants from each scripture-based tradition to select a text on peace that they felt represented their tradition. We then followed a consistent structure: multiple readings of the text, followed by the sharing of a word, then a phrase, then a teaching, and finally an open discussion, concluding with silent meditation for the contemplatio phase. Music accompanied our sessions, and texts were often chanted or recited in their original languages—Hebrew, Arabic, and Chinese among them. I am happy to report that the experience was both profound and deeply successful for all involved.

We concluded with a beautiful outdoor ritual led by Sherri, including a blessing of the directions and prayers for the sick and the dead. Originally, I had hoped to meet at our motherhouse in Camaldoli, surrounded by the silence of its ash forests, but that was not possible. Instead, we gathered in a small, quiet park nearby, which proved to be a fitting and grounding conclusion to our time together and helped solidify our bonds of friendship.

We also shared an early morning meditation each day and participated in the monastic prayers—both here with the brothers and once at Sant’Anselmo for solemn second Vespers for the Solemnity of the Holy Trinity, which the group found very moving. In between were lively conversations over meals and evening walks through Rome. On the final day, we visited the Dicastery for Interreligious Dialogue, where we met Cardinal George Jacob Koovakad, prefect, Monsignor Indunil Janakaratne Kodithuwakku Kankanamalage, secretary, and  Father Paulin Batairwa Kubuya, undersecretary. Father Bonaventure Mwenda also joined us later. They seemed genuinely impressed by the group’s reflections, and it was heartening to see smaller conversations emerge organically—Fr. Paulin speaking Mandarin with Heng Sure, and Father Bonaventure discussing African traditional religions with Sherri.

One participant described the entire experience as nothing less than ecstatic.

We will now begin planning an expanded gathering for next year, with carefully chosen additional participants. I am confident that we have made a strong beginning. From the outset, I have understood that among the four forms of dialogue encouraged by the church, our particular mandate is the dialogue of religious experience. I believe we have found a meaningful way to embody that calling—remaining rooted in our own traditions while remaining open to truth as it is revealed through others. For my part, what moved me most deeply was witnessing the love each participant holds for their own tradition and sacred texts. More than ever, I am convinced of the importance of learning what lies at the heart of each tradition and, as Nostra aetate teaches, of striving to “recognize, preserve, and promote” these treasures.

 


 

Saturday, May 9, 2026

What Would Love (Jesus) Do?/Cosa farebbe l'amore (Gesù)?


A few years ago, there was a phrase that was very popular among some American Christians:

“What would Jesus do?”[i]

Actually it was usually written using only the initials of each word: W-W-J-D.

You’d often see it on rings or T-shirts.

I remember thinking at the time that it was a bit silly, a passing fad.

But it suddenly came back to me one day

and it struck me as a brilliant summary of the Christian life:

we should always strive to emulate Jesus’ love, compassion, and ethical actions in our daily lives,

with a special emphasis on forgiveness, mercy, and service.

It’s a good idea to ask ourselves day after day, minute after minute:

“What would Jesus do in this situation?”

“What would Jesus say,” or perhaps, “How would Jesus say it?”

(As a matter of fact, last time I was in the States I was tempted to buy one of those rings!)

 

I say this because a few days ago I came across a poem titled

“What would love do?”

And it occurred to me that in a certain sense, it’s the same question:

“What would Jesus do?” and “What would love do?”.

Maybe it was a secular way of saying the same thing.

I don’t mind; it could be a step toward God.

It reminded me of St. Augustine’s saying:

Dilige, et quod vis fac – “Love—and do what you will.”

That is taken from his homilies on the First Letter of John[ii]

where Augustine was trying to show that if we are truly rooted in love––

and that is a big “if”!––, our actions will be good.

If we are truly rooted in love, we will be able to act freely.

 

Then I did a little research and discovered that this phrase, “What would love do?”,

is actually very popular!

There are songs titled “What Would Love Do.”

And there are several poems and self-help posts written by therapists.

There’s even a perfume called “What Would Love Do”!

 

I was giving this secular version of concept the benefit of the doubt

until I read some of the song lyrics and the words of the poems.

For the most part, they weren’t enough for me.

 

Some of them were just about self-care. One therapist wrote, for example:

 

“By love, I mean that kind of loving care that has my best interests at heart, along with those of everyone else. An unconditional love—sometimes fierce, sometimes tender—that many of us never experienced as children, and perhaps not even as adults.”

 

Okay, but…

 

Others were full of reassuring images and platitudes.

The perfume ad was particularly amusing; it read:

 

Love would lift you up with mandarin oil when you need a boost.

Love would calm you with lavender when worries weigh on your mind.

 

I’m not sure that’s what Jesus had in mind when he said:

‘Love one another as I have loved you.’

 

We know what love would do, because we have seen what Jesus did:

love is crucified love.

The greatest love—let’s not misunderstand—is to lay down one’s life for one’s friends,

as we heard in today’s Gospel.[iii]

It is not a feeling; it is an action.

 

St. Benedict tells his monks that love is mutual obedience.

He titles Chapter 71 Ut oboedientes sibi sunt invicem

“So that they may obey one another”!

And then, in the following chapter, he quotes Romans 12:10:

Strive to show respect for one another, and

no one should seek what is best for themselves,

 but rather what they consider best for someone else.

 

This is what love would do; this is what true love would do; this is what mature love could do.

 

This is the hallmark of a Christian community, whether monastic or not:

that each of us be a servant to the other.

As we remember Easter, we look back and remember Jesus at the Last Supper,

washing his disciples’ feet.

 

‘This is my commandment,’ says Jesus, very directly.

Love one another as I have loved you.

As one of my yoga teachers used to say: “It’s simple, but it’s not easy!”

 

Let us pray that, at this banquet of love,

at the table of the Word and the Sacrament,

we may be inspired and given the strength to love as Jesus loved

 

And then we can as we will.



[i] The phrase actually comes from a novel published in the early twentieth century titled *In His Steps*.

[ii] 1 Jn 4:4–12.

[iii] Jn 15:12–17.

______________________________________________ 

(italiano)

Qualche anno fa, tra alcuni cristiani americani, era molto diffusa una frase: “What would Jesus do?” ovvero, “Cosa farebbe Gesù?”[i]

In realtà, di solito veniva scritta solo con le iniziali di ogni parola, ovvero W-W-J-D.

La si vedeva spesso su anelli o magliette.

Ricordo di aver pensato all’epoca che fosse un po’ sciocco, un tipo fad.

Ma mi è tornata in mente all’improvviso un giorno

e mi è sembrata una brillante sintesi della vita cristiana:

dovremmo cercare sempre di emulare l’amore, la compassione, le azioni etiche e di Gesù nella nostra vita quotidiana,

con un’enfasi particolare sul perdono, sulla misericordia e il servizio.

È una buona cosa chiederci giorno dopo giorno, minuto dopo minuto:

“Cosa farebbe Gesù in questa situazione?”

“Cosa direbbe Gesù”, o forse, “Come lo direbbe Gesù?”.

 

Lo dico perché qualche giorno fa mi sono imbattuto in una poesia intitolata

“What would love do?”––“Cosa farebbe l’amore?”

E mi è venuto in mente che in un certo senso è la stessa domanda:

“Cosa farebbe Gesù?” e “Cosa farebbe l’amore?”.

Forse era un modo laico di dire la stessa cosa.

Non mi dispiace; potrebbe essere un passo verso Dio.

Mi ha ricordato la frase di Sant’Agostino:

Dilige, et quod vis fac – “Ama – e fa’ ciò che vuoi”.

Era tratta dalle sue omelie sulla prima lettera di Giovanni[ii] dove Agostino cercava di mostrare che se siamo veramente radicati nell’amore––

ed è questo un grande “se”!––,

le nostre azioni saranno buone.

Se siamo veramente radicati nell’amore potremo agire liberamente.

 

Poi ho fatto una piccola ricerca e ho scoperto che questa frase, “Cosa farebbe l’amore?”––

“What would love do?”, è in realtà molto popolare!

Ci sono canzoni intitolate “What Would Love Do”.

C’è persino un profumo chiamato “What Would Love Do”!

E ci sono diverse poesie e diversi post di auto-aiuto (self-help) scritti da terapeuti.

 

Stavo dando a questo uso secolare del concetto il beneficio del dubbio

finché non ho letto alcuni testi delle canzoni e le parole delle poesie.

Per lo più per me non bastavano.

 

Alcuni di essi parlavano solo di cura di sé. Un terapeuta ha scritto per esempio:

“Per amore intendo quel tipo di attenzione amorevole che ha a cuore il mio interesse insieme a quello di tutti gli altri. Un amore incondizionato, a volte feroce, a volte tenero, che molti di noi non hanno sperimentato da bambini e forse nemmeno nella vita adulta”.

 

Okay, ma…

 

Altri erano pieni di immagini rassicuranti e di banalità.

La pubblicità del profumo era particolarmente divertente, recitava:

 

L’amore ti solleverebbe con l’olio di mandarino quando hai bisogno di una spinta. L’amore ti calmerebbe con la lavanda quando le preoccupazioni pesano sulla tua mente.

 

Non sono sicuro che fosse questo ciò che Gesù aveva in mente quando dice:

‘Che vi amiate gli uni gli altri come io vi ho amato.’

 

Sappiamo cosa farebbe l’amore, perché abbiamo visto cosa ha fatto Gesù:

l’amore è amore crocifisso.

Il più grande amore – non fraintendiamo – è dare la vita per i propri amici,

come abbiamo sentito nel vangelo di oggi.[iii]

Non è un sentimento; è un’azione.

San Benedetto ci dice che l’amore è obbedienza reciproca.

Intitola il capitolo 71 Ut oboedientes sibi sunt invicem

“Affinché si obbediscano l’un l’altro”!

E poi, nel capitolo successivo, cita Romani 12,10:

Cercate di avere rispetto gli uni per gli altri e

Nessuno deve perseguire ciò che ritiene meglio per sé stesso,

 ma piuttosto ciò che ritiene meglio per qualcun altro.

 

È cosa farebbe l’amore, è cosa farebbe un amore vero, è cosa potrebbe fare un amore maturo.

 

Questo è il segno distintivo di una comunità cristiana,

sia monastica che non-:

che ciascuno di noi sia servitore dell’altro.

Mentre ricordiamo la Pasqua, guardiamo indietro e ricordiamo Gesù durante l’Ultima Cena,

lavando i piedi ai suoi discepoli.

 

Questo è il mio comandamento, dice Gesù, in modo molto diretto.

Amatevi gli uni gli altri come io ho amato voi.

Come diceva un mio insegnante di yoga: “È semplice, ma non è facile!”

 

Preghiamo affinché, in questo banchetto d’amore,

alla tavola della Parola e del Sacramento,

ci venga ispirata e data la forza di amare come Gesù ha amato

– e poi possiamo fare come vogliamo. 


[i] La frase deriva in realtà da un romanzo pubblicato all’inizio del ventesimo secolo intitolato «In His Steps»–– Nei suoi passi.

[ii] 1 Gv 4,4-12.

[iii] Gv 15, 12-17.